Williams et al v. State of North Carolina et al
| Daniel D. Williams and Pattie D. Williams |
| State of North Carolina, Nash County and BLB Trading L.L.C. |
| 5:2012cv00680 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| NASH |
| James C. Dever |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING 35 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and a New Trial, DENYING 37 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING 39 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief U.S. Judge James C. Dever, III, on 7/18/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs via US Mail. (Fisher, M.)
|
|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss [D.E. 15, 20] to the extent that they relate to federal claims, and DISMISSES Plaintiffs' federal claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or alternatively, Rule 12(b)(6). The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims and DISMISSES Plaintiffs' state-law claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motions [D.E. 18, 32]. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 11/14/2013. A copy of the judgment was mailed to the pro se plaintiffs. (Sawyer, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
