Miles v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Arnita Louise Miles
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 5:2015cv00172
Filed: April 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: VANCE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order to show cause entered June 2, 2015, that this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 06/22/2015. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miles v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arnita Louise Miles
Represented By: Garey Malcolm Ballance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?