Merz North America, Inc. v. Cytophil, Inc.
| Merz North America, Inc. |
| Cytophil, Inc. |
| Cytophil, Inc. |
| Merz North America, Inc. |
| 5:2015cv00262 |
| June 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Malcolm J. Howard |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
ORDER adopting 249 Memorandum and Recommendation. The court adopts the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own and construes the claims as indicated in the Memorandum and Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 2/6/2019. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing
253
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 212 Cytophil's Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 9/26/2017. (Foell, S.)
|
|
Filing
227
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 6/21/2017. (Foell, S.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and deferring in part 34 Motion to Stay: The court GRANTS Defendant's request for a thirty-day extension of its deadline for filing contentions under Local Patent Rule 303.3 and for responding to Plaintiff's Octob er 19, 2015, discovery requests. The court DEFERS ruling on Defendant's request for a stay of the proceedings pending Plaintiff's deadline for responding to such request. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 11/14/2015. (Lee, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
