United States of America v. Sidbury Personal Property, Specifically Described As: et al
| United States of America |
| Sidbury Personal Property, Specifically Described As, $8,747.07, $69,927.75, $13,586.58 and $12,979.91 |
| 5:2015cv00542 |
| October 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| W. Earl Britt |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Sidbury Personal Property Specifically Described As: $12,979.91 seized from Wells Fargo Bank, Account Number 1000004238806 $13,586.58 seized from Wells Fa rgo Bank, Account Number 3000195353290, $69,927.75 seized from Branch Banking and Trust, Account Number 0005591135432, $8,747.07 seized from Branch Banking and Trust, Account Number 0005102492457. The U. S. Marshal's Service is hereby directed to dispose of the defendants according to law. Upon the entry of this judgment, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/16/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Entry of Default - Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/20/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Stay - The court stays these proceedings until such time as the related criminal proceedings have been finally determined. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/15/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
