Contreras v. TriComm Utility Services LLC, et al
Miguel Contreras |
TriComm Utility Services LLC, Michael Sweat and Nicholas Boney |
5:2015cv00576 |
October 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 JUDGMENT - Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/2/2018. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying without prejudice 45 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment - If plaintiff does not so move for entry of default against defendant Tricomm within 21 days of the date of this order, the clerk is DIRECTED to dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by U.S. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/25/2017. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 39 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Default Judgment and granting 36 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/24/2016. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Entry of Default as to Defendants TriComm Utility Services LLC and Nicholas Boney - Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 6/6/2016. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying 14 Corrected MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION AND COURT-SUPERVISED NOTICE TO POTENTIAL OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b) - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to effectuate service on defendants. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/22/2015. (Tripp, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.