Rivercliff Properties, Inc. v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificate Number AVAC084293 et al
| Rivercliff Properties, Inc. |
| Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificate Number AVAC084293, Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Certificate Number TMILVAC116757, Rivercliff Road NC Trust, Francis White and Rick D. Lail |
| 5:2016cv00215 |
| April 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Remaining for adjudication is plaintiffs breach of contract claim against the Lloyd's London defendants. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file not later than October 14, 2016, an amended complaint which removes paragraph twenty-two of the original complaint. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/7/2016. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and granting 16 and 19 Motions for Extension of Time. The Lloyd's London and Rivercliff Trust defendants shall have through and including 6/7/2016 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/17/2016. (Romine, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
