Capps v. Harris et al
||Monty Harris, Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc., Newmark Southern Region, LLC and Does 1-25
||March 29, 2018
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Western Division Office
||Terrence W. Boyle
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 6, 2019
ORDER granting 66 Motion to Compel Gregory Katz's and Monty Harris's Motion to Compel Arbitration of Commission Disputes; granting 89 Motion to Seal Document 88 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit; denying 106 Motion to Strike (Greg Katz's and Monty Harris's Motion to Strike Declaration of Pietro Deserio); granting 140 Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration. The parties are DIRECTED t o arbitrate plaintiff's claims for commissions owed to him. These consolidated cases are STAYED pending resolution of arbitration. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report within 180 days of the date of this order, and every 180 da ys thereafter until arbitration is completed, providing a summary of the status of arbitration proceedings. Where the case is stayed pending completion of arbitration, the clerk is DIRECTED to terminate all motions pending on the docket. The parties will be permitted to refile their motions following arbitration. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/6/2019. (Collins, S.)
|November 26, 2018
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/26/2018. (Tripp, S.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?