Ruiz v. Berryhill
Ramiro Roman Ruiz |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
5:2018cv00223 |
May 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
CUMBERLAND |
James C. Dever |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 26 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Ramiro Roman Ruiz, granting 30 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Nancy A. Berryhill, and affirms the Commissioner's determination. This action is dismissed. The Clerk shall close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 8/27/2019. (Stone, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ruiz v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ramiro Roman Ruiz | |
Represented By: | Angela R. Cinski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.