Butler v. NC Department of Public Safety
John Edward Butler |
NC Department of Public Safety and Claudette Edwards |
5:2018hc02250 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by John Edward Butler. (Love, L.) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Edward Butler. (Love, L.) |
Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Edward Butler. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (Love, L.) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Love, L.) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - (1) The papers are not on the forms prescribed for use by this court; (2) The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/17/2018. Copy of Order, petition form, and application to proceed without payment of fees sent via US Mail to John Edward Butler at Odom Correctional Institution. (Love, L.) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to John Edward Butler at Odom Correctional Institution. (Love, L.) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Edward Butler. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.