Dukes v. Whitehurst et al
| Demetrius Demon Dukes |
| Derek Lee, Adam Ambrose and Terrance Whitehurst |
| 5:2019ct03071 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 4/22/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to plaintiff at Bertie Martin Regional Jail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case Submitted to Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 5 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 4
Order (Prisoner Litigation Reform Act). Response to Order due by 4/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 3/19/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Demetrius Demon Dukes at Bertie Martin Regional Jail. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Demetrius Demon Dukes. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adam Ambrose, Derek Lee and Terrance Whitehurst filed by Demetrius Demon Dukes. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
