Simuel v. Harris et al
| Dontez Lamont Simuel |
| Michael Duggan, Scott S. Harris and Laurie Wood |
| 5:2019ct03267 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Dontez Lamont Simuel at Eastern Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 MOTION "Requesting Court to have United States Marshall or Deputy Marshall or Someone Specially Appointed to Serve Process" filed by Dontez Lamont Simuel. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Dontez Lamont Simuel. (Attachment: #1 Declaration in Support) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Duggan, Scott S. Harris and Laurie Wood filed by Dontez Lamont Simuel. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Documents in Support, #3 Documents in Support, #4 Documents in Support, #5 Documents in Support, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Cover Letter, #8 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motions Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever, III regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and #3 MOTION "Requesting Court to have United States Marshall or Deputy Marshall or Someone Specially Appointed to Serve Process." Case also submitted for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
