Stakeley v. 3M Company
| William Stakeley |
| 3M Company |
| 5:2019cv00315 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Malcolm J Howard |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER - This case is transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of April 3, 2019, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Stay lifted on 8/15/2019.) (Sellers, N.) |
| Case transferred to Northern District of Florida. File transmitted electronically. (Sellers, N.) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by William Stakeley (Ramey, Martin) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Martin A. Ramey on behalf of William Stakeley. (Ramey, Martin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court, this case is reassigned to United States District Judge James C. Dever III for all further proceedings. Senior United States District Judge Malcolm J. Howard is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings shall reflect the revised case number of 5:19-CV-315-D. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/26/2019. (Hockaday, A.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to William Stakeley. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5035761.), filed by William Stakeley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Ramey, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stakeley v. 3M Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3M Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Stakeley | |
| Represented By: | Martin A. Ramey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
