Hines v. Saul
SHERRY HINES |
Andrew M. Saul |
5:2019cv00323 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Process Receipt and Return served on Attorney General of the United States on 8/19/19. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 9 Summons Returned Executed as to Andrew M. Saul served on 8/14/2019, answer due 10/13/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 8 Process Receipt and Return served on Office of Program Law Social Security Administration on 8/15/19. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 5 Notice filed by SHERRY HINES Corrected exhibit 3-Date Stamped Denial Notice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Complaint, #3 Exhibit AC Denial of Review, #4 Proposed Summons 285-summ USA, #5 Proposed Summons 285-summ AG-USA, #6 Proposed Summons 285-summ OGC-SSA) (Clauson, Vaughn) |
Remark - Certified copy of Order #4 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statements forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by SHERRY HINES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AC Denial of Review) (Collins, S.) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 8/1/2019. (Collins, S.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Exhibit 3 - Date-Stamped denial notice. Counsel filed an illegible or improperly formatted document. Counsel is directed to refile using the event Notice-Other. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by SHERRY HINES (Clauson, Vaughn) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Vaughn Stephen Clauson on behalf of SHERRY HINES. (Clauson, Vaughn) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHERRY HINES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 proposed complaint, #3 Exhibit Date-Stamped denial notice, #4 Proposed Summons AG-USA, #5 Proposed Summons OGC-SSA, #6 Proposed Summons US Attorney) (Clauson, Vaughn) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hines v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SHERRY HINES | |
Represented By: | Vaughn Stephen Clauson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.