UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Diamond Perfection, Inc.
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: Diamond Perfection, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2020cv00036
Filed: January 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 REMINDER TO COUNSEL regarding #3 Memorandum in Support. Pursuant to Judge Myers' Practice Preferences, counsel shall provide a courtesy copy of any motion, memorandum, or brief which exceeds 30 pages or of any exhibits which exceed a total of 30 pages, by mailing or delivering to the attention of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, 1003 South 17th Street, Wilmington, NC 28401. The courtesy copies of any motion, memorandum, or brief and supporting exhibits which exceed a combined total of 100 pages shall be submitted in a three-ring binder. (Edwards, S.)
January 30, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Neal Fowler on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Fowler, Neal)
January 30, 2020 Filing 3 Memorandum in Support regarding #1 Complaint, (Petition for Summary Enforcement of Inspector General Subpoena Duces Tecum) filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of SA Mark Satter, #3 Exhibit 2 - Subpoena Duces Tecum dated July 23, 2019, #4 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of SA Nicolas Evans, #5 Exhibit 4 - Email from Angell to Kafka dated July 29, 2019, #6 Exhibit 5 - Correspondence to James Angell dated August 7, 2019, #7 Exhibit 6 - Email from Kafka to Angell dated August 29, 2019, #8 Exhibit 7 - Email from Kafka to Dilone dated September 20, 2019, #9 Exhibit 8 - Correspondence to Angell and Dilone dated November 14, 2019, #10 Exhibit 9 - Email from Dilone to Satter dated November 21, 2019, #11 Exhibit 10 - Correspondence to Satter from Dilone dated October 4, 2019, #12 Exhibit 11 - Email from Fowler to Dilone dated December 12, 2019) (Fowler, Neal)
January 30, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Diamond Perfection, Inc. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*). (Rudd, D.)
January 30, 2020 Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.)
January 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Petition for Summary Enforcement of Inspector General Subpoena Duces Tecum) against Diamond Perfection, Inc., filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Fowler, Neal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Diamond Perfection, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Neal Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Diamond Perfection, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?