Parker v. Lock et al
| Jamie Neil Parker |
| Karla Beth Denning, Thomas H. Lock and Kristen Ball |
| 5:2020cv00359 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #4 Order and MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jamie Neil Parker. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 4
ORDER and MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 8/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 7/27/2020. (A copy of this Order and M&R was sent via US mail to Jamie Neil Parker, 202 Charlie Rd., Four Oaks, NC 27524.) (Collins, S.)
|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Jamie Neil Parker. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Jamie Neil Parker. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
