Johnson v. Nash Hospitals, Inc.
| Nakisha Johnson |
| Nash Hospitals, Inc. and Nash Hospitals, Inc. d/b/a Nash UNC Health Care |
| 5:2021cv00274 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Nakisha Johnson. Nash Hospitals, Inc. waiver sent on 7/22/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. (Kelly, Alexander) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nash Hospitals, Inc. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Alexander C. Kelly on behalf of Nakisha Johnson. (Kelly, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Nakisha Johnson (Kelly, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nash Hospitals, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6114931.), filed by Nakisha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kelly, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
