McMillian v. Capital Area Transit et al
| Eric M. McMillian |
| Capital Area Transit, Scott McClellin, Matthew McCall, Officer Patton, Officer Rosa and M. N. Klingenmaier |
| 5:2021cv00432 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Redirect to a File with Leave (to Replace Defendant) filed by Eric M. McMillian. (Stouch, L.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.) |
| Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Eric M. McMillian. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Eric M. McMillian. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Eric M. McMillian. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Supplement to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
