King v. State of N.C.
Kenneth King |
State of N.C. and Drew Stanley |
5:2021hc02130 |
June 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from Kenneth King asking if the court has received his documents and filing fee. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Courtesy copy of docket sheet sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number RAL086141. (Indig, A.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #2 MOTION to Vacate. Case also submitted for petition review. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 5 CORRECTED PETITION (on the form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenneth King. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Deficiency. The petition is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court and the filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 7/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 6/16/2021. Copy of order and forms sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Kenneth King at Franklin Correctional Center. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate - Discharge filed by Kenneth King. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenneth King. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.