Harper v. Superintendent Warden of Jail et al
Morris Lee Harper |
Superintendent Warden of Jail and Greenville County Sheriff |
5:2021hc02237 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
Filing 6 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Poole, A) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Morris Lee Harper. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (on form) filed by Morris Lee Harper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for petition review. (Poole, A) |
Filing 3 ORDER of Deficiency. The petition is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 12/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., on 11/17/2021. Copy of order and forms sent to petitioner. (Poole, A) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via U.S. Mail to Morris Lee Harper at Pitt County Detention Center. (Poole, A) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Morris Lee Harper. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.