Hunter v. State of North Carolina
Steven Hunter |
State of North Carolina and Denise Jackson |
5:2022hc02126 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. (Castania, M) |
Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for preliminary review. As soon as review is completed by the court, an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to petitioner.) (Castania, M) |
Filing 5 CORRECTED PETITION (on the form) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Steven Hunter. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER of Deficiency. The petition is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND the filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 8/11/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 7/21/2022. Copy of order and forms sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 Letter to petitioner regarding filing of petition. (Castania, M) |
Filing 1 PETITION ("Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus") for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Steven Hunter. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.