Scovell v. O'Malley
| Jadore Scovell |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 5:2024cv00387 |
| July 3, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Wanda D. Mason on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley. (Mason, Wanda) |
| NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE SERVICE - This action is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate office within the Social Security of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of this case and Plaintiff's complaint. No summons will issue. Defendant's deadline to serve an answer or motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 is governed by Supplemental Rule 4. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jadore Scovell (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by George C. Piemonte on behalf of Jadore Scovell. (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7677645.), filed by Jadore Scovell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Piemonte, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
