Plummer v. Colvin
||Brenda Rose Plummer
||Carolyn W Colvin
||June 20, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Southern Division Office
||James C. Fox
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 20, 2017
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that upon stipulation and agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff $6,400.00 in attorney's fees in full satisfaction of any and all claims arisin g under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Such payment should be sent to: James B. Gillespie, Jr. Attorney for Plaintiff Law Offices of James B. Gillespie, Jr., PLLC 415 Chestnut Street Wilmington, NC 28401 (910) 763-5485 Lawoff email@example.com. Provided that the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiffs counsel, James B. Gillespie, Jr. and mailed to the office address above in accordance w ith Plaintiff's assignment to counsel of her right to payment of attorney fees under EAJA. If the award is subject to Offset, the remaining fees, if any, will be payable to Plaintiff and sent to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/20/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|March 7, 2017
JUDGMENT - the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and§ 1383(c)(3) with a remand ofthe cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 3/7/2017. (Edwards, S.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?