Livingston v. North Carolina State Bar et al
Christopher W. Livingston |
North Carolina State Bar and 13th District Bar |
7:2018cv00005 |
January 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
BLADEN |
James C. Dever |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 8, 20, 26], DENIES Livingston's motion for leave to file an amended complaint [D.E. 35], and DISMISSES without prejudice the federal claims. The court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Livingston's state law claims and DISMISSES those claims without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on April 12, 2018, Livingston voluntarily dismissed the 13th District Bar as a defendant when the Amended Complaint was filed. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/5/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 40 ORDER: the court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 8, 20, 26], DENIES Livingston's motion for leave to file an amended complaint [D.E. 35], and DISMISSES without prejudice the federal claims. The court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Livingston's state law claims and DISMISSES those claims without prejudice. The clerk shall close the case. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/4/2019. (Jenkins, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.