Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. v. Savage Services Corporation
Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. |
Savage Services Corporation |
7:2022cv00158 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Robert B Jones |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Financial Disclosure Statement by Savage Services Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Savage Enterprises, LLC, Corporate Parent Savage Enterprises Intermediate, LLC, Corporate Parent Savage Enterprises Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Savage Companies for Savage Services Corporation. (Pocock, Donald) |
Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Savage Services Corporation (Pocock, Donald) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Savage Services Corporation. (Pocock, Donald) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT regarding #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued by Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Delivery) (Mohr, Philip) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Bruce Oakley, Inc. for Oakley Fertilizer, Inc.. (Mohr, Philip) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Philip J. Mohr on behalf of Oakley Fertilizer, Inc.. (Mohr, Philip) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Savage Services Corporation. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAVAGE SERVICES CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6692712.), filed by OAKLEY FERTILIZER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Draft Agreement, #2 Exhibit 8/14/18 Email, #3 Exhibit Final Draft Agreement, #4 Exhibit Executed Agreement, #5 Exhibit Invoice 9401000000554, #6 Exhibit Invoice 9401000000868, #7 Exhibit 7/6/22 Letter, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Proposed Summons) (Mohr, Philip) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. v. Savage Services Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Philip J. Mohr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Savage Services Corporation | |
Represented By: | Donald R. Pocock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.