Nelson v. United States of America
| Dean Odell Nelson |
| United States of America |
| 7:2022mc00005 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| P.I.: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Memorandum in Support regarding #12 MOTION for Entry of Order Allowing Deposition or for Setting of a Hearing Date filed by Dean Odell Nelson. (Wallace, Mona) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Entry of Order Allowing Deposition or for Setting of a Hearing Date filed by Dean Odell Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Wallace, Mona) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Timothy B. Walthall on behalf of United States of America. (Walthall, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by William M. Graham on behalf of Dean Odell Nelson. (Graham, William) |
| Filing 9 Affidavit of Service for Rule 27 Petition filed by Dean Odell Nelson served on United States of America c/o AG of the U.S., and United States of America c/o Office of the U.S. Attorney on November 17-21, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service) (Williams, Whitney) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by LaCresha A. Johnson on behalf of United States of America. (Johnson, LaCresha) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Mark P. Doby on behalf of Dean Odell Nelson. (Doby, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Whitney Wallace Williams on behalf of Dean Odell Nelson. (Williams, Whitney) |
| Filing fee: $49.00, receipt number 500000525. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #5 Notice - other (Unissued Summons) - This is not a case for a summons to be issued. Counsel should serve the PETITION to Perpetuate Testimony on counsel for the government and file a certificate of service. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 5 Notice filed by Dean Odell Nelson regarding #1 Petition to Perpetuate Testimony (Unissued Summons). (Wallace, Mona) |
Filing 4
ORDER - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division miscellaneous case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, is the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:22-MC-5-BO. No further filing shall be made in 7:22-CV-186. Petitioners are directed to pay the miscellaneous filing fee on or before November 15, 2022. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/7/2022. (Rudd, D.)
|
| Case Redesignated as a miscellaneous case as directed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court's order at docket entry #4 . Case Number 7:22-MC-5-BO. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Dean Odell Nelson (Wallace, Mona) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Mona Lisa Wallace on behalf of Dean Odell Nelson. (Wallace, Mona) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Dean Odell Nelson. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Perpetuate Testimony of Dean Odell Nelson., filed by Dean Odell Nelson. (Wallace, Mona) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
