ROGERS v. MAJOR SHOAF

ROGERS v. MAJOR SHOAF

Plaintiff:	REGINALD LEE ROGERS, SR.
Defendant:	SHOAF
Case Number:	1:2007cv00326
Filed:	April 13, 2007
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	Durham Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 28, 2010	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, except as to Plaintiff's claim regarding the decision to place him in solitary confinement on March 5, 2007, Defendant Shoaf's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket En try 16 ) be GRANTED to the extent it relies on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that, as to those claims, this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing if and when Plaintiff exhausts his administrative remedi es as to said claims. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, as to Plaintiff's claim regarding the decision to place him in solitary confinement on March 5, 2007, Defendant Shoaf's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry [ 16]) be GRANTED based on the doctrine of qualified immunity and that said claim be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, Defendant Shoaf's Motion to Strike (Docket Entry 20 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTH ER RECOMMENDED that, in Case No. 1:07CV327, Defendant Grices Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 19) be GRANTED based on the doctrine of qualified immunity and that Plaintiff's action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in Case No. 1:07CV327, Defendant Grice's Motion to Strike (Docket Entry 23 ) is DENIED AS MOOT signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 6/28/2010. (Wilson, JoAnne)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 28, 2010

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, except as to Plaintiff's claim regarding the decision to place him in solitary confinement on March 5, 2007, Defendant Shoaf's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket En try 16 ) be GRANTED to the extent it relies on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that, as to those claims, this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing if and when Plaintiff exhausts his administrative remedi es as to said claims. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, as to Plaintiff's claim regarding the decision to place him in solitary confinement on March 5, 2007, Defendant Shoaf's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry [ 16]) be GRANTED based on the doctrine of qualified immunity and that said claim be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in Case No. 1:07CV326, Defendant Shoaf's Motion to Strike (Docket Entry 20 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTH ER RECOMMENDED that, in Case No. 1:07CV327, Defendant Grices Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 19) be GRANTED based on the doctrine of qualified immunity and that Plaintiff's action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in Case No. 1:07CV327, Defendant Grice's Motion to Strike (Docket Entry 23 ) is DENIED AS MOOT signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 6/28/2010. (Wilson, JoAnne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROGERS v. MAJOR SHOAF
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: REGINALD LEE ROGERS, SR.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SHOAF
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?