BLACK v. NEW JERSEY STATE

BLACK v. NEW JERSEY STATE

Plaintiff:	JOHN D. BLACK
Defendant:	NEW JERSEY STATE
Case Number:	1:2010cv00727
Filed:	September 17, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Hoke
Nature of Suit:	Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2010	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 11/30/10, that the court dismiss this action with prejudice on the grounds of res judicata. Moreover,THAT PLAINTIFF JOHN D. BLACK BE ENJOINED from filing any lawsuits, moti ons, or additional allegations against the State of New Jersey, its constituent institutions, and (or) its officials unless he seeks and obtains leave from the undersigned or from a United States District Court of competent jurisdiction, after Plaint iff first attaches copies of the entirety of the pleadings from the following cases, Black v. New Jersey State, 1:10CV727, M.D.N.C. (filed Sept. 17, 2010), Black v. City of Newark, 1:06CV534, M.D.N.C. (filed June 14, 2006), Black v. City of Newark, 5:98-CV-696-BR (3), E.D.N.C. (order filed July 19, 1999), and after Plaintiff submits a detailed written statement explaining why the new lawsuit, motion, or allegation is materially different from those in the foregoing three cases. (Law, Trina)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2010

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 11/30/10, that the court dismiss this action with prejudice on the grounds of res judicata. Moreover,THAT PLAINTIFF JOHN D. BLACK BE ENJOINED from filing any lawsuits, moti ons, or additional allegations against the State of New Jersey, its constituent institutions, and (or) its officials unless he seeks and obtains leave from the undersigned or from a United States District Court of competent jurisdiction, after Plaint iff first attaches copies of the entirety of the pleadings from the following cases, Black v. New Jersey State, 1:10CV727, M.D.N.C. (filed Sept. 17, 2010), Black v. City of Newark, 1:06CV534, M.D.N.C. (filed June 14, 2006), Black v. City of Newark, 5:98-CV-696-BR (3), E.D.N.C. (order filed July 19, 1999), and after Plaintiff submits a detailed written statement explaining why the new lawsuit, motion, or allegation is materially different from those in the foregoing three cases. (Law, Trina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BLACK v. NEW JERSEY STATE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN D. BLACK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NEW JERSEY STATE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?