U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. A.C. WIDENHOUSE, INC.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
A.C. WIDENHOUSE, INC. |
Contonius Gill |
1:2011cv00498 |
June 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Cabarrus |
UNASSIGNED |
P. TREVOR SHARP |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 2/22/2013, that EEOC is entitled to recover from Widenhouse the amount of Fifty Thousand dollars ($50,000) in compensatory and punitive damages. FURTHER, that Mr. Gill is entit led to recover from Widenhouse the amount of One Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand Five Hundred Nine and 79/100 dollars ($193,509.79), this sum being comprised of One Hundred and Five Thousand and 00/100 dollars ($105,000) in compensatory and p unitive damages, plus Seventy-One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Two and 82/100 dollars ($71,662.82) in back pay, plus compounded prejudgment interest on the back pay award in the amount of Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-Six and 97/100 dollars ($16,846.97). FURTHER, that Plaintiffs be awarded their costs of this action and that the parties are advised that any application for attorneys' fees must comply with Local Rule 54.2(Daniel, J) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 01/14/2013, that the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. This action will proceed to trial on Intervenor-Plaintiff Contonius Gill's claims alleging racially hostile work environment, discriminatory discharge, and retaliatory discharge in violation o f federal law, and on Plaintiff EEOC's claim alleging hostile work environment in violation of Title VII and Title I. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Gills state law claim of wrongful discharge. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 12/19/2012, recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 24 ] be granted as to Plaintiff Gill's s tate law claim of wrongful discharge, but otherwise be denied. FURTHER, ordering that Defendant's Motion to Strike [Doc. # 27 ] is GRANTED without prejudice to the decision being reconsidered to the extent it pertains to evidence admissible at trial. (Israel, Lisa) Modified to include language erroneously omitted in original text entry on 12/19/2012 (Israel, Lisa). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.