LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION and LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CANADA LTD.
Defendant: AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, LTD and JOHN DOES 1-10
Case Number: 1:2012cv00625
Filed: June 22, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Guilford
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER signed on 2/7/2014. Defendants have satisfied their burden to demonstrate that the Canadian forum is substantially more convenient. Therefore, this Court RECO MMENDS that the motion to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens (Docket Entry 26 ) be GRANTED and the action be DISMISSED, without prejudice to refilling in Canada. Further RECOMMENDING that, in the event the Court adopts this Recommendation, Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Docket Entry 24 ) be DENIED AS MOOT. (Daniel, J)
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 1/23/13, that Plaintiffs' Motion to Exchange Exhibit F to Raiter Affidavit with Redacted Version is GRANTED. FURTHER that Plaintiffs shall publicly re-file all exhibits to the Raiter Affidavit previously filed under seal, including a redacted version of Exhibit F, by January 30, 2013. (Law, Trina)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
Represented By: RICHARD T. BOYETTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CANADA LTD.
Represented By: RICHARD T. BOYETTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?