PIERCE v. ROTH et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 5, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 3/5/2014, for the reasons stated herein, the court concludes that Pierce's amended complaint states a plausible Title VII retaliation claim. Therefore, the court declines to adopt the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. ORDERED that Universal Steel's motion to dismiss (Doc. 27 ) is DENIED. (Butler, Carol)
|January 13, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/13/2014. For the foregoing reasons, this court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to his third cause of action for retaliation. RECOMMENDED that Defendant's motion to dismiss be GRANTED and Plaintiff's claim for retaliation be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Taylor, Abby)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?