LATTIMORE v. HERRON et al
| DON ORLANDO LATTIMORE |
| KRISTIE B. STANBACK, JOEL HERRON, JOHN OR JANE DOE, GARY CRUTCHFIELD and DERRICK RAY |
| 1:2013cv00692 |
| August 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Scotland |
| UNASSIGNED |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 01/14/2014, that in forma pauperis status be granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.FURTHER that Pla intiff's trust officer shall be directed to pay to the Clerk of this Court 20% of all deposits to his account starting with the month of February, 2014, and thereafter each time that the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $400.00 filing fee has been paid. If an inmate has been ordered to make Prison Litigation Reform Act payments in more than one action or appeal in the federal courts, the total amount collected for all cases cannot exceed 20 percent of the inm ate's preceding monthly income or trust account balance, as calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Doc. # 3 ] is DENIED. RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
