MOBLEY v. BARNES
JASON DARNELL MOBLEY |
B. J. BARNES, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COURT SERVICES BUREAU, GREENSBORO DETENTION CENTER, LEGAL PROCESS DIVISION and GREENSBORO DETENTION INFIRMARY |
1:2017cv00115 |
February 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
L. PATRICK AULD |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 4/20/2017. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket Entry 1 ) is GRANTED for the limited purpose of con sidering this recommendation of dismissal. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims against the Guilford County Sheriff's Office, Court Services Bureau, Greensboro Detention Center, Legal Process Division, and Greensboro Detention Infirmar y be dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2), as those defendants are not amenable to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's speedy due process and false arrest claims against Sheriff Barn es be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's bacterial infection claim against Sheriff Barnes be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a claim, but without prejudice. (Daniel, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.