CHURCHWELL V. CITY OF CONCORD
Plaintiff: JANA CHURCHWELL
Defendant: CITY OF CONCORD
Case Number: 1:2017cv00299
Filed: April 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Cabarrus
Presiding Judge: CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 6/11/2018. ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, Doc. 14 , is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the defendants motion for summary judgment, Doc. 16 , is DENIED. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHURCHWELL V. CITY OF CONCORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANA CHURCHWELL
Represented By: KIRK J. ANGEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF CONCORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?