OPTOLUM INC. v. CREE INC.
| OPTOLUM INCORPORATED |
| CREE INC |
| 1:2017cv00687 |
| July 24, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
384
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, (Doc. 368 ), is DENIED. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 08/19/2022. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
357
REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 11/24/2021. Re 343 SEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. See 356 Order.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
345
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 11/24/2021. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) Regarding Lack of Willfulness (Doc. 323 ) is GRANTED. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
230
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 09/28/2020, that Defendant's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 190 ), is GRANTED with respect to Cree's argument that the G en 2.5 bulbs do not infringe and to Cree's argument that the Single Ring bulbs do not literally infringe. Defendant's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 190 ), is DENIED as to the remaining claims. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Leave to File a Surreply, (Doc. 220 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that the parties shall file briefs concerning the most appropriate method to address the issue of ensnarement, either in a pre-trial evidentiary hearing or after trial. Parties' briefs shall be no longer than seven (7) pages in length and shall be filed within ten (10) days after the issuance of this Memorandum Opinion and Order.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 07/11/2019, that Defendant's Motion to Strike, (Doc. 172 ), is DENIED. FURTHER that the parties shall meet and confer and submit to this court an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Report by July 17, 2019.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 12/28/2018, that Plaintiff's motion to compel, (Doc. 154 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that Defendant shall serve Plaintiff with a statement of th e reasonable costs and expenses incurred in restoring the Mimosa System and an invoice payable by Plaintiff for one half of those costs and expenses. Such costs and expenses are not to include either attorney or non-attorney fees associated with an y review of recovered data or costs associated with Defendant's production to Plaintiff of such data. FURTHER that, within ten days of receiving such statement of reasonable costs and expenses, Plaintiff shall file with this court either: (1) a notice - indicating Plaintiff's agreement to pay its share of the costs and expenses, or (2) a memorandum of no more than five pages explaining why Plaintiff contests the reasonableness of the amount. FURTHER that, within five days of filing by Plaintiff of any memorandum contesting the reasonableness of the claimed expenses, Defendant shall file a response of no more than five pages. FURTHER that failure to comply with this Order shall result in the payment of the costs and expenses associated with restoring the Mimosa System by the non- complying party.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
152
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 08/22/2018, as set out herein. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 72 Motion to Amend/Correct. Cree shall file its amended answer within 14 days from the date of this order. Granting 81 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged surreply (Doc. 82 ). Cree's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer for Improper Venue (Doc. 73 ) is granted. The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/24/17.(DXD)[Transferred from Arizona on 7/24/2017.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
