UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. LOVELY

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARK A. LOVELY
Case Number: 1:2018cv00102
Filed: February 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: LORETTA C. BIGGS
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7401
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 03/18/2019; that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 7 ), is DENIED; that Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement, (ECF No. 17 ), is DENIED; and that Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 20 ), is DENIED. (Samuel-Priestley, Tina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. LOVELY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: ERIN F. DARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK A. LOVELY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?