SHAUGHNESSY v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SHAUGHNESSY
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY and PRIVATE DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC, PLLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv00461
Filed: May 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Durham
Presiding Judge: CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 139 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 7/23/2020; The motion for summary judgment, Doc. 113 , is GRANTED as to the tortious interference with prospective economic advantage claim and that claim is DISMISSED. Duke University's motion for summary judgment, Doc. 109 , is DENIED as to the plaintiff's claims under the ADA arising out of his depression and acts in support of others with depression, his breach of contract claim a rising out of the "satisfactory performance" term, the tortious interference with prospective economic advantage claim, and the tortious interference with contract claim. Duke University's motion for summary judgment, Doc. 109 , is o therwise GRANTED. Dr. Shaughnessy's motion for partial summary judgment on Duke's after-acquired evidence-of-misconduct defense, Doc. 108 , is GRANTED. Dr. Shaughnessy's motion for partial summary judgment on his breach of contract claim, Doc. 108 , is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 11/19/2018 that: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by the defendant Private Diagnostic Clinic, Doc. 21 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Dr. Shaughnessy's Title VII and ADA claims are dismissed to the extent they are directed at PDC; and 3. Dr. Shaughnessy's state law claims against PDC are not dismissed. (Sheets, Jamie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAUGHNESSY v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SHAUGHNESSY
Represented By: ANDREW J. HENSON
Represented By: MICHAEL A. KORNBLUTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRIVATE DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?