GARRETT v. TARGET CORPORATION
Plaintiff: GLORIA T GARRETT and GLORIA T. GARRETT
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2018cv00702
Filed: August 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Cabarrus
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Case Reassigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. UNASSIGNED no longer assigned to the case. (Marsh, Keah)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Appointing ROBERT A. BEASON as the mediator pursuant to LR 83.9d(a). Signed by John S. Brubaker, Clerk of Court. (Gammon, Cheryl)
September 13, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. (Gammon, Cheryl)
September 13, 2018 MEDIATION SCHEDULING ORDER ; Mediation due by 3/15/2019. (Gammon, Cheryl)
September 11, 2018 TEXT ORDER adopting #11 Joint 26(f) Report with the following modification: the parties shall file any dispositive motions by 04/15/2019. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 09/11/2018. (AULD, L.)
September 11, 2018 Reset Dispositive Motions Deadlines. Motions due by 4/15/2019. (Contreras, Jamie)
September 11, 2018 Set Scheduling Order Deadlines: Discovery shall be established as Complex. Mediation should be conducted late in the discovery period, the exact date to be set by the mediator after consultation with the parties. The parties agree that the mediator shall be Robert A. Beason. The parties do not consent to the referral of the case to a Magistrate Judge. The parties agree that trial of this matter will take approximately three to five days. Plaintiff's Amended Pleadings due by 10/31/2018. Defendant's Amended Pleadings due by 11/15/2018. Discovery due by 3/15/2019. Joinder of Parties for Plaintiff due by 10/31/2018. Joinder of Parties for Defendant due by 11/15/2018. (Garland, Leah)
September 7, 2018 Motions Referred: RE: #11 Rule 26(f) Report (Joint) filed by all parties, to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD (Garrett, Kim)
September 4, 2018 Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Report (Joint) filed by all parties by TARGET CORPORATION.(POOLE, SAMUEL)
August 23, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MEREDITH A. FITZGIBBON on behalf of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION (FITZGIBBON, MEREDITH)
August 23, 2018 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION. (POOLE, SAMUEL)
August 22, 2018 Filing 8 ***FILED IN ERROR***Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION. (POOLE, SAMUEL) Modified on 8/23/2018 to mark filed in error and to remove access to document. Attorney instructed to properly re-file. (Garland, Leah)
August 22, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 9/24/2018 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garrett, Kim)
August 21, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by TARGET CORPORATION. (POOLE, SAMUEL)
August 15, 2018 Filing 5 ECF 30 Day Notice as to Attorney LAWRENCE B. SERBIN. ECF 30 Day Notice due by 9/14/2018. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 15, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle)
August 15, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 15, 2018 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. Set flag for Magistrate Judge L. Patrick Auld. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 14, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TARGET CORPORATION. (Original document issued in Cabarrus County Superior Court on 07/05/2018, and is listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal) (Coyne, Michelle)
August 14, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against TARGET CORPORATION, filed by GLORIA T. GARRETT. (Original document filed in Cabarrus County Superior Court, Case Number 18CV2094 and is listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal)(Coyne, Michelle)
August 14, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against GLORIA T GARRETT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2406959.), filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Removal to Federal Court)(POOLE, SAMUEL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARRETT v. TARGET CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLORIA T GARRETT
Represented By: LAWRENCE B. SERBIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLORIA T. GARRETT
Represented By: LAWRENCE B. SERBIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By: SAMUEL H. POOLE, JR.
Represented By: MEREDITH A. FITZGIBBON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?