JARDINE v. BERRYHILL
ALICIA JARDINE |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2019cv00012 |
January 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake on 03/07/2019, that Plaintiff is permitted to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk the correct summons for service on the Defendant. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the Complaint and Summons upon the Defendant. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by ALICIA JARDINE.(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by ALICIA JARDINE. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Motions Referred to Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.