ROBINETTE V. TESLA, INC.
| TAYLOR ROBINETTE |
| TESLA, INC. and TESLA, INC. doing business as TESLA MOTOR COMPANY |
| 1:2019cv00905 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case by TAYLOR ROBINETTE. (NORRIS, JACOB) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/28/2019. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docs. #6 , #8 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall arbitrate all causes of action asserted in the complaint. FURTHER that this action is STAYED. The parties are directed to report to the court no later than December 31, 2019, on the status of the arbitration or within fourteen days of any decision of the arbitrator that would affect the status of the present action, if the matter is resolved before December 31, 2019. (Daniel, J)
|
| Motion Submitted to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER: #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. (Engle, Anita) |
| Filing 8 Corrected document re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Retail Sales Installment Contract, #2 Exhibit B - New Vehicle Limited Warranty, #3 Exhibit C - NCDS Decision)(CLEARY, PATRICK) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to State Court of Filing Petition for Removal by Defendant TESLA, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Durham County Clerk's Acknowledgement of Receipt of Notice of Removal)(CLEARY, PATRICK) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by TESLA, INC.. Response to Motion due by 10/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Exhibit A (to Motion and Memo in Support) - Retail Sales Installment Contract, #3 Exhibit B (to Motion and Memo in Support) - New Vehicle Limited Warranty, #4 Exhibit C (to Motion and Memo in Support) NCDS Decision)(CLEARY, PATRICK) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Case assigned to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to TESLA, INC. (Original document issued in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS3431 on 07/16/2019 and is listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against TESLA, INC., filed by TAYLOR ROBINETTE. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS3431 and is listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendant Tesla, Inc. d/b/a Tesla Motor Company by Tesla, Inc. d/b/a Tesla Motor Company.(CLEARY, PATRICK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Taylor Robinette ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2648036.)(Related Case # 19-CVS-003431), filed by Tesla, Inc. d/b/a Tesla Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CLEARY, PATRICK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
