KELLY v. SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION
RICKY KELLY |
SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION |
1:2019cv01048 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. (TOUPS, BENTON) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JOSEPH E. HJELT on behalf of Plaintiff RICKY KELLY (HJELT, JOSEPH) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney BENTON L. TOUPS on behalf of Defendant SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION (TOUPS, BENTON) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Complaint by SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(FLANAGAN, PATRICK) |
Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS3217, issued 9/6/2019 and is listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION, filed by RICKY KELLY. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS3217 and is listed as Exhibit B to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. (FLANAGAN, PATRICK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney PATRICK HOUGHTON FLANAGAN on behalf of Defendant SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION (FLANAGAN, PATRICK) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against RICKY KELLY (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2674149), filed by SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons to Defendant, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (FLANAGAN, PATRICK) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION. Answer due by 11/21/2019. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 10/15/2019. (Brubaker, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: KELLY v. SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RICKY KELLY | |
Represented By: | MICHAEL A. KORNBLUTH |
Represented By: | JOSEPH E. HJELT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SPC MECHANICAL CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | PATRICK HOUGHTON FLANAGAN |
Represented By: | BENTON L. TOUPS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.