NOONSAB v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff: SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case Number: 1:2020cv00479
Filed: May 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: CATHERINE C EAGLES
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 6/30/2020 adopting the Magistrate Judge's recommendation; that this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms and in the proper district, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. (Hicks, Samantha)
June 26, 2020 CASE REFERRED RE: #4 Objection to Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, #5 Objection to Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES (Sanders, Marlene)
June 10, 2020 Filing 5 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Plaintiff SOMCHAI NOONSAB. Response to Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol)
June 10, 2020 Filing 4 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Plaintiff SOMCHAI NOONSAB. Response to Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol)
June 2, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2020. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 6/19/2020. (Hicks, Samantha)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 6/2/2020; ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms and in the proper district, which corrects the defects cited above. (Hicks, Samantha)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 6/2/2020; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Order and Recommendation. (Hicks, Samantha)
May 29, 2020 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha)
May 29, 2020 CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha)
May 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, filed by SOMCHAI NOONSAB. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NOONSAB v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?