CHAPMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Plaintiff: CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Case Number: 1:2020cv00656
Filed: July 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 9/24/2020 09:30 AM in Winston-Salem Courtroom #3 before MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Garrett, Kim)
August 20, 2020 Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (MCINNES, ALAN)
August 14, 2020 Filing 6 Notice to Parties RE: SO30. Responses due by 9/14/2020 (Winchester, Robin)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Answer due by 8/19/2020. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 7/21/2020. (Brubaker, John)
July 20, 2020 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCINNES, ALAN)
July 15, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie)
July 15, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 20-CVS-2600, issued 6/5/2020 and listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie)
July 15, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, filed by CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 20-CVS-2600 and listed as Exhibit B to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie)
July 15, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441 (Federal Question) against CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2843957), filed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety-Office of Recovery and Resiliency. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Summons, #2 Exhibit B--Complaint) (MCINNES, ALAN)
July 15, 2020 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie)
July 15, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie)
July 15, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHAPMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN
Represented By: JOHN HEYDT PHILBECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Represented By: ALAN D. MCINNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?