CHAPMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN |
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY |
1:2020cv00656 |
July 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 9/24/2020 09:30 AM in Winston-Salem Courtroom #3 before MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Garrett, Kim) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (MCINNES, ALAN) |
Filing 6 Notice to Parties RE: SO30. Responses due by 9/14/2020 (Winchester, Robin) |
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Answer due by 8/19/2020. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 7/21/2020. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCINNES, ALAN) |
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 20-CVS-2600, issued 6/5/2020 and listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, filed by CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 20-CVS-2600 and listed as Exhibit B to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441 (Federal Question) against CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2843957), filed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety-Office of Recovery and Resiliency. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Summons, #2 Exhibit B--Complaint) (MCINNES, ALAN) |
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CHAPMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CHYNICE AISHA CHAPMAN | |
Represented By: | JOHN HEYDT PHILBECK |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY | |
Represented By: | ALAN D. MCINNES |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.