MARTIN, et al. v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
BLAZING 7'S SKILL GAME AND FISH TABLE, LLC and MARQUETT MARTIN doing business as BLAZING 7'S SKILL GAME & FISH |
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY |
1:2020cv00858 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
N C TILLEY |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants, filed by MARQUETT MARTIN, BLAZING 7'S SKILL GAME AND FISH TABLE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Nautilus Insurance Policy (Martin))(BLACKWELL, WADE) |
Filing 10 MEMORNADUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF #9 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III and IV of Plaintiffs' Complaint and Plaintiff Marquett Martin d/b/a/ Blazing 7's Skill Game & Fish Count for Breach of Contract (Count I) filed by NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Policy No. NN996924)(O'BRIEN, KEVIN) Modified on 10/29/2020 to correct title of document and remove reply deadline. (Winchester, Robin). |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III and IV of Plaintiffs' Complaint and Plaintiff Marquett Martin d/b/a/ Blazing 7's Skill Game & Fish Count for Breach of Contract (Count I) by NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. Response to Motion due by 11/18/2020 (O'BRIEN, KEVIN) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney WADE ALLAN BLACKWELL on behalf of Plaintiffs BLAZING 7'S SKILL GAME AND FISH TABLE, LLC, MARQUETT MARTIN (BLACKWELL, WADE) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer / Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(O'BRIEN, KEVIN) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. Answer due by 10/28/2020. Signed by Gloria L. Powell on 9/28/2020 on behalf of John S. Brubaker, Clerk of Court. (Powell, Gloria) |
Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (State Court document originally filed in Rockingham County Superior Court, case number 20CVD1911, issued 8/10/2020) (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, filed by MARQUETT MARTIN, BLAZING 7'S SKILL GAME AND FISH TABLE, LLC. (State Court document originally filed in Rockingham County Superior Court, case number 20CVD1911) (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney KEVIN MICHAEL O'BRIEN on behalf of Defendant NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY (O'BRIEN, KEVIN) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendant NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY (O'BRIEN, KEVIN) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Blazing 7's Skill Game and Fish Table, LLC, Marquett Martin d/b/a Blazing 7's Skill Game & Fish ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2896570.), filed by NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint (Rockingham County State Court Action), #2 Exhibit B- Nautilus Policy NN 996294, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(O'BRIEN, KEVIN) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Garland, Leah) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.