WIDEMAN v. SAUL
Plaintiff: CARLOS WIDEMAN
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 1:2020cv00933
Filed: October 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: CATHERINE C EAGLES
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT as to ANDREW SAUL served on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/1/2021. as to (HALL, CHARLOTTE)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent - SSA. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Hicks, Samantha)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 10/13/2020; that Plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service upon each defendant, including the correct address and the name and title of the individual to be served on behalf of a corporation, association, infant, incompetent, or government agency. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the complaint and summons upon each defendant. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Motion Referred: RE: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by CARLOS WIDEMAN. (HALL, CHARLOTTE)
October 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by CARLOS WIDEMAN.(HALL, CHARLOTTE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WIDEMAN v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARLOS WIDEMAN
Represented By: CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?