PARKER v. TORRES et al
| MICHAEL PARKER |
| CAPTAIN TORRES, OFFICER REESE, OFFICER KERSITTER and OFFICER MORENO |
| 1:2021cv00173 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 3/3/2021; that Plaintiff in the above-named action be, and is hereby, permitted to file and prosecute said action in this Court without prepayment of fees or giving security therefor, subject to the conditions set forth below. FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff shall, within sixty (60) days after the date of this Order, submit to the Clerk an initial payment of $0.33 (which represents 20% of the greater of the average monthly deposits into or the balance in Plaintiff's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding filing of this complaint). FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's trust officer shall be directed to pay to the Clerk of this Court 20% of all deposits to his account starting with the month of April of 2021, and thereafter each time that the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid. FURTHER ORDERED that all payments deducted in relation to this case shall be designated as made in payment of the filing fee for Civil Action No. 1:21CV173, and shall be paid to the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In the event Plaintiff is transferred to another institution, the balance due shall be collected and paid to the Clerk by the custodian at Plaintiff's next institution. A copy of this Order shall be sent to Plaintiff's current custodian. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be filed, but that further proceedings and service of summons be stayed until Plaintiff has either (1) submitted to the Court the initial payment noted above, or (2) in the alternative has submitted a motion for relief from the stay, and a statement made under penalty of perjury that he has not had access to any funds for the initial payment noted above for the 60-day period. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion (Docket Entry #4 ) seeking an appointment of counsel is denied. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER IN A TIMELY MANNER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by MICHAEL PARKER. Responses due by 3/23/2021. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST by Plaintiff MICHAEL PARKER entitled "Plaintiff first Request for Prediction of Documents Fed Rule of Civil Pro, 26 and 34." (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHAEL PARKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back, #2 Cover Letter) (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by MICHAEL PARKER. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
