NEUMANN v. WENDELLE et al
| WEBSTER R. NEUMANN |
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT WENDELLE |
| 1:2021cv00233 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of North Carolina Eastern; Case Number 5:21-hc-02073. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3
ORDER transferring case to the Middle District of North Carolina. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/23/2021. Copy of order sent to petitioner via U.S. Mail. (Poole, A) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 3/24/2021.]
|
| CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Garland, Leah) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via U.S. Mail to Webster R. Neumann Greene Correctional Institution. (Poole, A) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 3/24/2021.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Webster R. Neumann. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 3/24/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
