YOUNG v. ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
Plaintiff: JOROD QUTEZ YOUNG
Defendant: ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and SAMUEL PICKNEY
Case Number: 1:2021cv00730
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D SCHROEDER
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2021 Filing 4 JUDGMENT signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/19/21, adopting the Magistrate Judges Recommendation, that this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Butler, Carol)
October 19, 2021 CASE REFERRED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING by MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Complaint filed by JOROD QUTEZ YOUNG. (Engle, Anita)
September 22, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2021. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 10/12/2021. (Hicks, Samantha)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 9/22/2021; ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above. (Hicks, Samantha)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 9/22/2021; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Order and Recommendation. (Hicks, Samantha)
September 21, 2021 CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha)
September 21, 2021 Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMUEL PICKNEY, ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, filed by JOROD QUTEZ YOUNG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOROD QUTEZ YOUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMUEL PICKNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?