CLAYTON v. RED ROBIN, INC.
Joseph Clayton |
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and RED ROBIN, INC. |
1:2021cv00983 |
December 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
CATHERINE C EAGLES |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff JOSEPH CLAYTON (ANGEL, KIRK) |
Filing 4 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 1/4/22. (Winchester, Robin) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet. (ANGEL, KIRK) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/3/2022 with flattened PDF version) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS by JOSEPH CLAYTON. Waiver sent on 12/30/2021, answer due 2/28/2022. (ANGEL, KIRK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RED ROBIN, INC. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0418-3202412), filed by JOSEPH CLAYTON. (ANGEL, KIRK) Modified on 1/3/2022 to correct party names. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.