NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC. et al
Plaintiff: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.
Defendant: ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC. and INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00431
Filed: June 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Referring Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiffs DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC., NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION (CHAMBERLIN, ANDREW)
June 8, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus)
June 8, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons - INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.) (Carter, Alexus)
June 8, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Carter, Alexus)
June 8, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Carter, Alexus)
June 7, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. (CHAMBERLIN, ANDREW)
June 7, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiffs NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS AG identifying Corporate Parent NOVARTIS AG for NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION.. (CHAMBERLIN, ANDREW)
June 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3314564), filed by NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US797303) (CHAMBERLIN, ANDREW) Modified on 6/8/2022 to remove duplicate text in attachment title. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Represented By: ANDREW S. CHAMBERLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.
Represented By: ANDREW S. CHAMBERLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?