SLOVAK v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al
Plaintiff: Richard J. Slovak
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, SYNGENTA CORPORATION and CORTEVA, INC.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01059
Filed: December 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Referring Judge: THOMAS D SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney RICHARD L. COFFMAN on behalf of Plaintiff RICHARD J. SLOVAK. ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number NCMDC-3464373.) (COFFMAN, RICHARD) Modified on 1/9/2023 to remove unrelated cases. (Hicks, Samantha)
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus)
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons - SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, #2 Summons - SYNGENTA CORPORATION, #3 Summons - CORTEVA, INC.) (Carter, Alexus)
December 28, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Carter, Alexus)
December 15, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Carter, Alexus)
December 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT -Class Action for Violation of the Antitrust Laws with JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3444430.)(Related Case # 1:22-cv-1055), filed by RICHARD J. SLOVAK. (WILLIAMS, KEVIN) Modified on 12/9/2022 to include the full title of document. (Carter, Alexus).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SLOVAK v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard J. Slovak
Represented By: KEVIN GUY WILLIAMS
Represented By: RICHARD L. COFFMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYNGENTA CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORTEVA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?